Promise of an education
By LeBron James from the Akron Beacon Journal
LeBron James writes a commentary for the one year anniversary of the LeBron James Family Foundation in their set up of the Wheels for Education program. This is a program in the Akron Public Schools that encourages students beginning in third grade to make a promise to stay committed to school until graduation. Being someone that grew up in the shoes of these students, LeBron believes that this program will work, and I have to agree with him.
Knowing that they have supporters behind them, these students are likely to feel encouraged to stay in school during the times when they just want to give up. One of LeBron's best ways of encouraging these students is by wearing a bracelet that says "I PROMISE" to let them know that he promises to not let them down, on the court and off. The only thing that bothered me about the article was the fact that his closing paragraph was thanking the people of Akron for their support during the 2011 NBA Finals. This took the attention away from the kids and onto himself. Despite that minor blemish, I was touched by this article and felt that I needed to do something in the near future to help make a difference in other people's lives.
ID for a better democracy
By Stephan and Abigail Thernstrom from the Los Angeles Times
After reading the article and thinking about it, I asked myself why the less fortunate would have IDs if they maybe could not even afford to buy a car. The best argument stated in this commentary is that because of the need for photo ID laws to vote is a new voter suppression movement. The only reason as to why I would disagree with these authors is because this law prevents citizens from voting more than once at different voting stations. If the process to receive a photo ID was not so difficult, then this law would not be as irrational as it seems to the poor community.
Paul Ryan and the party of theory
By E.J. Dionne Jr. from the Washington Post
Paul Ryan has spent most of his life in or associated with government, but has never run a business himself. He is an ideologist and has almost entirely theoretical views of the big issues. He is either unaware or does not consider the impact his decisions have on the lives of the people he has never even met. For example, it is asked how Ryan can justify his Medicaid cuts when they would likely leave 14-19 million poor people without health care coverage. It appears now that the republican party is the party of theory and the democrats are the ones asking the tough and practical questions regarding the impact their decisions have on Americans. The roles of the parties today are reversed from those of the late 1960s and 1970s.
The great points made the author has convinced me that there is a role reversal between the two political parties. I was captivated in this commentary, and now that I know more about the political parties, I have become more interested in wanting to know more about the republican presidential candidate and his vice. The best points made in this commentary persuaded the reading into siding with the democrats who are asking the more practical questions. I think that Americans are more likely to want to be ran by practical leaders instead of ones who do not keep the impact that decisions have on their country in mind. I can think what I want and so can the author of this commentary, but the decision is ultimately up to all of America.
'Sikhs are not Muslims.' And what if they were?
By Scott C. Alexander from the Los Angeles Times
Right after the big shooting at one of the Sikh temples on Wisconsin, news media, including CNN went out of their way to make it clear to Americans that "Sikhs are not Muslims." This commentary is questioning the point of that message asking if the people in the temple were members, would the shooting have been justified? The author and I both agree that the answer to that is no.
Right away after the questioning of the media's heading, I immediately wanted to keep reading the commentary. It should not matter what religion or race people are especially when they are members of our country. No such violence should be justified, and although it is difficult because of the tragedies of 9/11, no Arab Americans should be discriminated against because, Colin Powell said, "That's not American." I came across no confusion, and every point made in this commentary had significant meaning. Just like the incident involving the false intimations of Obama being a Muslim, it should not matter whether he is or not. This commentary is making a call to action for all Americans to take a stand similar to Powell's and send a message to all insisting that American Muslims should be thought of as a treasured part of who we are.
Science, such sweet mystery abounds
By David P. Barash from the Los Angeles Times
This commentary is something that I agree with and disagree with. The part that confuses me is that the importance of teaching the areas of science that we do know is not identified as important. I believe that it is extremely important for our students to learn about the areas that we are certain on being one hundred percent correct. Once a foundation of these things is formed, then teachers should start broadening their students horizons. This is where I agree with the author because the only way we can put more things into the category of what we know, the more the knowledge of humans expands. Once everything is learned inside the boundaries, then those boundaries can be removed from the sophisticated students filled with the knowledge that we know is true.
No comments:
Post a Comment